In a significant legal victory, Atlas Jewellery India Ltd has received a favorable ruling from the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), overturning earlier restrictions imposed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). The case revolved around alleged violations of disclosure norms and minimum public shareholding requirements, but the tribunal found that the company was not liable for the actions attributed to its promoters.
Background of the Case
-
SEBI had previously barred Atlas Jewellery from accessing the securities market for one year, citing failure to disclose preferential share allotments and violations of public shareholding norms
-
The allegations stemmed from a 2014 preferential allotment of shares to four Dubai-based entities, which SEBI claimed were acting in concert with the company’s promoters
-
Atlas Jewellery challenged the ruling, arguing that the knowledge and actions of its promoters should not be imputed to the company itself
Tribunal’s Findings
-
The SAT acknowledged that while the promoters may have acted in concert with foreign entities, Atlas Jewellery itself lacked direct knowledge or intent
-
The tribunal cited precedents, including the DLF Ltd vs SEBI case, to support the distinction between a company’s liability and that of its directors or promoters
-
The court concluded that SEBI’s order exceeded the scope of its show cause notice, and that Atlas Jewellery had not willfully violated disclosure norms
Implications for Atlas Jewellery
-
The ruling lifts the one-year ban on market participation, allowing the company to resume trading and investor engagement
-
It also sets a precedent for how regulatory bodies attribute liability in cases involving complex shareholding structures
-
Atlas Jewellery is now expected to comply with minimum public shareholding norms as directed, but without punitive restrictions
Sources: Indian Kanoon, CaseMine, Indian Kanoon