Bharti Airtel is opposing Reliance Jio’s proposal to utilize the 26 GHz 5G spectrum band for local Wi-Fi services. While Jio argues the model lowers urban broadband costs, Airtel warns of potential mobile signal interference and safety concerns, prompting regulatory bodies to draft special technical guidelines.
NEW DELHI — A major technical and regulatory standoff has emerged within India’s telecommunications sector as Bharti Airtel Limited officially opposed a corporate proposal by Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited to deploy its premium 26 GHz 5G spectrum band for local Wi-Fi broadband services. The dispute, highlighted in recent regulatory filings with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), centers on whether high-cost airwaves originally auctioned exclusively for mobile networks can be structurally reallocated for localized wireless internet streaming.
The policy division between the market leaders comes at a critical time, as the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and TRAI work to establish standard operating guidelines for Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) and high-frequency data transmission. The outcome of this dispute could reshape the economic landscape of India's 5G rollout and affect how next-generation broadband is delivered to enterprises and residential consumers.
Technical Standoff Over the 26 GHz Spectrum Band
The core of the dispute involves the high-frequency 26 GHz millimeter-wave (mmWave) band, which operators acquired for billions of rupees during the government's 5G airwave auctions. Reliance Jio has proposed utilizing its existing holdings in this specific band to power high-capacity Wi-Fi broadband networks. Jio argues that this method offers a highly cost-effective path to accelerate enterprise connectivity and provide cheaper, high-speed broadband in dense urban areas where laying physical fiber-optic cables faces severe right-of-way (RoW) bottlenecks.
Bharti Airtel has formally challenged this operational model in its submissions to the government and regulatory panels. Airtel argues that modifying the 26 GHz mobile spectrum to run localized Wi-Fi access configurations conflicts with established global telecom engineering standards.
The company raised specific technical concerns that deploying high-power mobile airwaves for local Wi-Fi functions could create severe signal interference with adjacent mobile networks. Additionally, Airtel highlighted potential risks concerning radio-frequency radiation safety thresholds and compatibility with existing satellite communication downlinks that share neighboring frequencies.
Spectrum Classification and Valuation Debates
The dispute extends into broader issues of regulatory compliance and spectrum valuation. Under current Indian licensing frameworks, telecom operators pay market-determined prices via competitive auctions for exclusive rights to mobile bands. Conversely, traditional Wi-Fi operations function over distinct, "de-licensed" or unlicensed spectrum blocks (such as the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands) that are open to public use without auction fees.
Airtel’s regulatory desk contends that allowing an operator to convert a licensed IMT (International Mobile Telecommunications) mobile band into an alternative Wi-Fi delivery mechanism changes the structural rules under which the spectrum was originally valued and sold. This debate mirrors a parallel discussion regarding Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) classification, where TRAI is closely reviewing whether services like Jio AirFiber and Airtel Xstream AirFiber should be officially counted as wireline or wireless connections for accounting and licensing fee metrics.
Official Sources Section
The corporate positions, technical arguments, and spectrum parameters detailed in this report are compiled from formal consultation responses and letters submitted by Bharti Airtel Limited and Reliance Jio Infocomm Limited to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). Operational data points are aligned with spectrum allocation maps managed by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) under the Ministry of Communications.
Quote Section
"According to officials reviewing the technical submissions, the telecom department is currently formulating a specialized framework, which may include a mandatory technical guard band, to isolate signal transmission lines and prevent cross-network interference before finalizing usage guidelines."
Why It Matters
For everyday internet users and commercial enterprises, this telecom dispute has direct practical implications. If Jio’s model secures regulatory clearance, consumers could see a new wave of ultra-high-speed, low-cost Wi-Fi networks in office complexes and public hubs, backed by heavy 5G infrastructure. However, if Airtel’s technical warnings prove correct, unauthorized deployments without proper safeguards could degrade regular 5G mobile signal stability and data speeds for nearby smartphone users due to frequency crowding.
Key Facts at a Glance
The Conflict: Airtel is opposing Jio’s proposal to repurpose high-frequency 26 GHz 5G mobile spectrum to run local Wi-Fi broadband networks.
Jio's Stance: Asserts the model reduces delivery costs, simplifies enterprise deployment, and bypasses physical fiber-laying challenges.
Airtel's Stance: Warns of severe signal interference, deviation from global standards, and unresolved radiation and satellite safety checks.
Regulatory Status: The DoT is drafting technical guidelines, including a potential "guard band" cushion, with final rules expected around mid-2026.
FAQ Section
1. Why does Reliance Jio want to use a 5G mobile band for Wi-Fi?
Jio aims to leverage the high data capacities of its 26 GHz mmWave 5G spectrum to deliver wireless broadband over short distances. This approach can provide an efficient alternative to laying physical fiber cables in crowded urban environments.
2. What are the primary risks raised by Bharti Airtel regarding this proposal?
Airtel has raised concerns regarding network signal interference, conflicts with international telecom equipment standards, and the need for thorough safety checks concerning satellite compatibility and radiation boundaries.
3. What is a "guard band" in telecom technology?
A guard band is an unused, narrow slice of spectrum placed between two active frequency blocks. It serves as a protective buffer zone to prevent the signals from overlapping or causing mutual interference.
Source:
