Image Source: Moneycontrol
Key Highlights
-
Home Minister Amit Shah sharply criticized the Congress party in Lok Sabha on July 28, 2025, accusing them of distrusting Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar’s official statements on Operation Sindoor while simultaneously placing faith in US President Donald Trump’s claims
-
-
Shah condemned Congress for undermining a minister of the Indian government who has taken a constitutional oath, asserting this lack of trust is why Congress remains in opposition and will continue to do so for at least 20 more years
-
-
The intervention came amid disruptions by Congress and other opposition members during Jaishankar’s detailed address on India’s diplomatic efforts and military response following the Pahalgam terror attack
-
-
Jaishankar categorically denied any linkage of trade or US mediation with India’s Operation Sindoor military action, clarifying there were no phone calls between PM Narendra Modi and Donald Trump between April 22 and June 17, 2025
-
-
The External Affairs Minister stressed that India’s military and diplomatic responses had overwhelming international backing, with only three out of 190 UN member nations opposing the decisive operation
-
-
Jaishankar highlighted the US designation of The Resistance Front (TRF) as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation following sustained Indian diplomatic pressure, underscoring global consensus against cross-border terrorism
-
-
Shah urged Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla to control opposition interruptions, warning that constant disruptions during ministerial statements undermine parliamentary decorum and hamper effective governance
-
-
The sharp exchanges reflect deeper political fault lines and contestations over national security narratives and foreign policy transparency regarding India-Pakistan relations
Details of Amit Shah’s Intervention
-
Home Minister Amit Shah’s intervention was triggered by repeated heckling of External Affairs Minister Jaishankar during his nearly 40-minute speech related to Operation Sindoor, India’s military retaliation following the Pahalgam attack. Shah rebuked the opposition for:
-
-
Not trusting a constitutional minister sworn to uphold India’s interest
-
-
Believing foreign narratives, specifically those projected by Donald Trump, despite official denials from the Indian government
-
-
Distracting parliamentary proceedings through continuous disruptions and sidetracking critical national security discourse
-
-
Shah emphasized that this distrust in India’s leadership and reliance on foreign claims typify the Congress party’s current disconnectedness from practical governance, forecasting their prolonged opposition status.
Jaishankar’s Key Points on Operation Sindoor and Diplomatic Stance
-
Rejected claims that Operation Sindoor was linked to trade negotiations or US mediation
-
-
Confirmed no communication between PM Modi and Trump during key intervention periods except for two phone calls conveying condolences and scheduling issues, not related to ceasefire or military halts
-
-
Detailed India’s strategic shift toward a “new normal” in counterterrorism comprising firm responses to terror, no mixing of terror and talks, and rejection of nuclear blackmail
-
-
Recognized international support from major global groupings including Quad, BRICS (with China’s participation), the EU, and nations like Germany and France in backing India’s right to defend itself
-
-
Credited India’s coordinated diplomatic efforts in securing US designation of TRF as a terror group, signaling the efficacy of global pressure on Pakistan-based terror infrastructure
-
-
Rejected Congress’s historical “Chindia” policy positions and criticized their previous approaches toward China and cross-border terrorism
Broader Political and Parliamentary Impact
-
The session highlighted stark partisan divisions over India’s foreign policy narratives, with Congress questioning government transparency and seeking to politicize international statements from Trump. Shah’s defense of ministerial integrity and insistence on parliamentary order signifies:
-
-
The ruling alliance’s intent to project unified national security messaging
-
-
Efforts to curb misinformation and partisan politicization on sensitive matters of diplomacy and military operations
-
-
Attempt to reinforce India’s sovereign discourse over foreign affairs without dilution by external or opposition influence
Conclusion
Home Minister Amit Shah’s forceful defense of External Affairs Minister Jaishankar’s statements on Operation Sindoor and rebuke of Congress’s trust in US President Trump underscored fundamental clashes over India’s diplomatic narrative and parliamentary conduct. With Jaishankar affirming India’s autonomous and globally supported strategic choices, this episode reflects the ongoing contest over India’s international positioning and the political stakes entwined with security discourse. Shah’s assertion that Congress will remain in opposition for decades points to deep political polarization framing India’s national interest debates.
Sources: Onmanorama, New Kerala News, Siasat.com
Advertisement
STORIES YOU MAY LIKE
Image Source: Investor Meet Company
Image Source: Downtown in Business
Advertisement
