Apple is resisting India’s directive requiring smartphone makers to pre-install the government’s Sanchar Saathi app on all new devices. While authorities argue the app helps block stolen phones and report fraud, Apple cites privacy and platform integrity concerns. The standoff sets the stage for a high-stakes debate between regulators and industry.
Apple has formally pushed back against the Indian government’s recent order mandating that all smartphone manufacturers preload the Sanchar Saathi app on devices sold in the country. The directive, issued by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), requires compliance within 90 days, including units already in transit or inventory.
Sanchar Saathi, a government-backed tool, is designed to help users verify device credentials, block stolen phones, and report telecom fraud. Authorities describe it as a public-interest measure, but Apple argues that mandatory preloading conflicts with its long-standing commitment to user privacy, platform integrity, and control over pre-installed apps.
Industry experts note that Apple has previously complied with similar requirements through alternative approaches, such as offering optional downloads rather than embedding apps directly. The company is reportedly engaging policymakers to explore a compromise rather than immediate compliance.
Major Takeaways
Government Directive: DoT mandates Sanchar Saathi pre-installation on all smartphones within 90 days.
Apple’s Position: Resists rule, citing privacy and platform integrity concerns.
App Purpose: Designed to block stolen devices, report fraud, and verify second-hand phones.
Industry Impact: Sets precedent for how global tech firms navigate local regulatory mandates.
Policy Debate: Raises questions about balancing public interest with user autonomy and corporate practices.
Notable Updates
Union Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia clarified that Sanchar Saathi is voluntary in use, and users can delete it.
Apple has informed officials it does not plan to comply fully, preferring dialogue over confrontation.
Privacy advocates warn of potential surveillance risks if government apps gain default access to devices.
The standoff could influence future tech regulation frameworks in India, especially around cybersecurity and consumer rights.
Conclusion: Apple’s resistance to India’s mandatory app preload rule highlights the tension between regulatory oversight and corporate autonomy. While the government frames Sanchar Saathi as a public-interest safeguard, Apple’s pushback underscores broader debates about digital privacy, user choice, and global tech governance. The coming months will reveal whether compromise or confrontation prevails.
Sources: ABP Live , New Indian Express , MacRumors .