Image Source: NDTV
Today, the prominent US high-frequency trading firm Jane Street filed a significant legal case against India’s market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), in the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT). This move marks an intensification in the ongoing dispute centered on allegations of market manipulation targeted at Jane Street, which SEBI had previously accused the firm of orchestrating in Indian securities markets. Jane Street claims that SEBI has not been providing the key documents and data the regulator is relying on to substantiate its accusations of market manipulation.
Key Highlights of the Dispute:
Jane Street’s Case Filing: Jane Street has initiated its legal appeal challenging SEBI’s interim order, which had alleged the firm engaged in manipulative trading strategies specifically involving India’s Bank Nifty and other index derivatives. The case was filed on September 3, 2025, in the SAT, the primary appellate authority for market regulatory orders in India.
Allegations by SEBI: SEBI asserted that Jane Street employed sophisticated intraday trading strategies on index options expiry days, manipulating benchmark indices such as the Bank Nifty. The regulator’s findings indicated that Jane Street took massive long positions in cash equities and futures, then reversed these positions in ways that depressed index levels, allowing the firm to profit from options positions. These allegations were outlined in SEBI’s detailed 105-page interim order published on July 3, 2025.
Financial Implications and Restrictions: Following these allegations, SEBI restrained Jane Street and related entities from trading in Indian securities markets and impounded approximately ₹4,843 crore (around $567 million) alleged as illicit profits into an escrow account. Jane Street complied by depositing the full amount but reserved its right to contest the case.
Transparency and Evidence Issues: Jane Street has publicly stated that SEBI has withheld documents and data it uses to justify the market manipulation claims. Jane Street’s legal team highlights this lack of disclosure as a critical impediment to mounting an effective defense.
Detailed Background:
SEBI’s investigation began in early 2024 following unusual activities and media reports suggesting improper trading patterns by Jane Street in India’s rapidly growing derivatives market. The regulator conducted a comprehensive probe into Jane Street’s trades between January 2023 and March 2025, focusing on expiry days—the semi-monthly deadlines when derivative contracts settle. SEBI alleged that Jane Street’s trades distorted market prices through strategic buying and selling that created artificial volatility and manipulated the price discovery process.
On January 17, 2024, SEBI noted that Jane Street consistently took the largest cash-equivalent risks in Futures & Options (F&O) segments on expiry days. The investigation revealed two major manipulative strategies, labeled “Intraday Index Manipulation” and “Extended Marking the Close,” which Jane Street allegedly employed on at least 18 expiry days. These strategies involved entering and reversing large trades in cash and derivative segments to engineer favourable outcomes for their options positions, disadvantaging retail investors.
SEBI’s interim order charged that Jane Street’s Indian-incorporated entities facilitated these manipulative schemes, enabling circumvention of certain regulatory restrictions that apply to Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs). The regulator emphasized that these trades were not bona fide arbitrage or hedging but calculated moves to distort benchmark indices for illicit profits at the expense of market integrity and retail participants.
Legal and Market Impact:
Jane Street’s legal challenge in the Securities Appellate Tribunal represents its attempt to obtain access to regulator materials and challenge SEBI’s findings. The case underscores ongoing tensions between global trading firms leveraging algorithmic strategies and national market regulators seeking to protect domestic markets, especially retail investors.
The dispute has also caused volatility in India’s options market, with trading volumes dropping nearly one-third after SEBI’s ban and restrictions on Jane Street. Market participants and legal analysts note the complexity of proving manipulation in high-frequency trading and derivative markets, where rapid trades and algorithmic strategies abound.
SEBI’s decision to communicate caution to Jane Street as early as February 2025 and then take formal action in July reflects the regulator’s intent to enhance investor protection in the world’s largest equity derivatives market, where India now represents about 60% of global trading volume.
Conclusion:
As of today, Jane Street has firmly opposed SEBI’s allegations and is pushing back through the legal system to access the regulator’s evidence and contest the interim order. SEBI has yet to publicly respond to Jane Street’s filing. The case is set to be a defining moment in India’s regulatory landscape for algorithmic and high-frequency trading firms and could set important precedents for transparency, enforcement, and market fairness.
Source: Reuters
Advertisement
Advertisement
