Vedanta Ltd., one of India’s largest diversified natural resources companies, is grappling with a significant legal and regulatory blow after the Supreme Court of India upheld a ruling by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) in the long-running dispute involving its subsidiary, Talwandi Sabo Power Ltd. (TSPL). The apex court’s decision effectively denies Vedanta additional compensation linked to deemed export benefits under India’s Foreign Trade Policy, prompting the company to initiate a comprehensive review of the judgment’s implications.
The verdict, delivered earlier this week, marks a turning point in Vedanta’s efforts to secure financial relief from its Punjab-based thermal power project. The Supreme Court ruled that TSPL was never legitimately entitled to deemed export benefits, thereby affirming APTEL’s earlier decision and closing the door on Vedanta’s plea for higher compensation2.
Background: The Talwandi Sabo Dispute
The case centers on Vedanta’s claim that its Talwandi Sabo Power project qualified for deemed export benefits under India’s Foreign Trade Policy. These benefits are typically extended to projects that contribute to domestic infrastructure using imported capital goods. Vedanta argued that TSPL met the criteria and sought additional compensation for the withdrawal of these benefits.
However, both APTEL and the Supreme Court found that TSPL did not meet the necessary conditions. The apex court concluded that the project was not a legitimate beneficiary of the scheme, citing procedural and eligibility shortcomings. This ruling not only denies Vedanta financial relief but also tightens its legal and regulatory options for future claims2.
Market Reaction and Financial Impact
Following the Supreme Court’s decision, Vedanta’s stock experienced a noticeable dip. Shares fell by over 2% on Wednesday, trading as low as ₹439 on the Bombay Stock Exchange, down from an opening price of ₹451.80. Investors reacted to the ruling with caution, concerned about the potential impact on Vedanta’s broader restructuring plans and its ability to unlock value from its power assets.
The judgment also casts a shadow over Vedanta’s proposed demerger of TSPL. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had previously rejected the demerger plan, citing non-disclosure of material liabilities—specifically, a ₹1,251 crore debt owed to China-based SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation3. With the Supreme Court now reinforcing the regulatory stance, Vedanta’s restructuring ambitions face renewed scrutiny.
Foreign Trade Policy Review Underway
In a parallel development, Vedanta has confirmed that it is reviewing the Supreme Court’s judgment in the context of India’s Foreign Trade Policy. The company is assessing how the ruling may affect its eligibility for similar benefits across other infrastructure and energy projects.
A spokesperson for Vedanta stated,
“We respect the Supreme Court’s decision and are currently reviewing its implications on our operations and future claims under the Foreign Trade Policy. We remain committed to compliance and transparency in all regulatory matters.”
Legal experts suggest that the ruling could set a precedent for how deemed export benefits are interpreted and applied, potentially affecting other companies with similar claims. The case underscores the importance of rigorous documentation and eligibility verification in securing government incentives.
Regulatory Landscape and Next Steps
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and the central government have also raised objections to Vedanta’s demerger plans, citing concerns over concealment of liabilities and procedural irregularities. SEBI has reportedly issued a warning to Vedanta, while the Centre has expressed that the proposed restructuring could hinder its ability to recover dues.
The next hearing on Vedanta’s demerger case is scheduled for September 17 at the NCLT. Meanwhile, the company is expected to engage with legal advisors and regulators to chart a path forward that aligns with the Supreme Court’s ruling and addresses stakeholder concerns.
Sources: Financial Express, MSN India, SCC Online
