Image Source: NDTV
In a landmark enforcement of foreign employment regulations, a Singapore court has imposed a hefty fine of S$13,000 (approximately US$10,000 or ₹8.8 lakh) on Pido Erlinda Ocampo, a 53-year-old Filipino domestic worker, for working unofficial part-time cleaning jobs on her rest days. The case highlights Singapore’s zero-tolerance approach to unauthorized employment among foreign domestic helpers, aiming to uphold labor laws and protect both employers and employees.
Key Highlights of the Case
Erlinda Ocampo had been legally employed in Singapore since 1994, working for four official employers over her three-decade tenure.
Despite holding valid work passes, Erlinda moonlighted as a part-time cleaner for two Singaporean households—Soh Oi Bek and Pulak Prasad—without permission, violating the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act.
Employment for Soh lasted about four years intermittently, from April 2018 to February 2020 and later from March 2022 to September 2024, involving cleaning duties two to three times monthly and earning S$375 monthly.
For Pulak Prasad, she worked from September 2019 to February 2020 and resumed during 2022-2024, cleaning once or twice monthly for roughly S$450.
The scheme came to light following an investigation initiated in December 2024 after a tip-off to the Ministry of Manpower (MOM).
Soh Oi Bek, who knowingly hired Erlinda, was also penalized with a S$7,000 fine.
Under Singapore law, unauthorized employment can attract fines up to S$20,000 and/or up to two years’ imprisonment. Employers face fines between S$5,000 and S$30,000 and/or imprisonment up to one year.
Legal and Social Implications
This ruling reinforces Singapore’s strict regulatory framework for foreign domestic workers, prohibiting them from secondary employment even on designated rest days to prevent exploitation and ensure fair labor practices. It also emphasizes the responsibility of employers who might inadvertently or knowingly engage workers in unauthorized jobs.
The large fines reflect the seriousness with which the authorities view repetitive offenses over an extended timeline, signaling strong deterrence.
Reactions and Government Stance
The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) reiterated its commitment to protecting rightful employment practices, stating that the new rules aim to balance workers' rights and employer responsibilities while ensuring social order and economic stability.
This case has sparked conversations around economic pressures faced by domestic workers who may seek additional income avenues, juxtaposed against legal boundaries designed for systemic order.
Conclusion: Upholding Law for Fair Employment
Singapore’s firm legal response in fining Pido Erlinda Ocampo and her unofficial employer serves as a cautionary example of the vigilance in enforcing employment laws pertaining to migrant workers. While acknowledging the challenges faced by domestic helpers, the government underscores that adherence to legal channels remains essential for sustainable labor practices benefiting all stakeholders.
Sources: Mothership.sg, NDTV, Channel News Asia, Times Now News
Advertisement
Advertisement
