Image Source: Taxscan
In a decisive legal development, the Supreme Court of India has dismissed an appeal filed against Smartworks Coworking Spaces Ltd., effectively removing a key hurdle to the company’s ₹560 crore initial public offering (IPO). The appeal, brought by New Delhi-based NGO Infrastructure Watchdog, alleged regulatory lapses and undisclosed investigations involving Smartworks’ promoters. However, the apex court found the claims to be based on fabricated documents and issued a stern warning to the petitioners and their legal counsel.
The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices P.S. Narasimha and A.S. Chandurkar, upholds the Securities Appellate Tribunal’s (SAT) earlier decision to allow Smartworks’ IPO to proceed. The court’s rebuke of the NGO’s conduct has sent a strong message about the importance of legal ethics and document authenticity in capital market litigation.
Key Highlights of the Supreme Court Ruling
The appeal against Smartworks’ IPO was dismissed on August 25, 2025
The court found that the NGO submitted a fake letter allegedly from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA)
Justices Narasimha and Chandurkar warned of serious consequences for future attempts to mislead the judiciary
The NGO’s legal team was criticized for failing to prevent the submission of questionable material
The ruling clears the way for Smartworks to proceed with its IPO, which had already seen strong investor interest
Background of the Dispute
Allegations and Appeal
Infrastructure Watchdog had approached SAT seeking to block Smartworks’ IPO, citing incomplete disclosures and alleged investigations against the Sarda family, the company’s promoters
The NGO presented what it claimed was a letter from the MCA to SEBI, suggesting pending inquiries
Rebuttal and RTI Evidence
Senior Advocate Gopal Subramanium, representing Smartworks, refuted the claim and produced a Right to Information (RTI) response from the MCA confirming that no such letter existed
The court was informed that the document was fabricated, prompting a sharp reaction from the bench
SAT’s Earlier Observations
SAT had previously dismissed the NGO’s plea, noting that Smartworks had disclosed all relevant complaints and responses in its red herring prospectus
The tribunal observed that the cited tax reports were indicative and had not led to formal notices or demands
Courtroom Dynamics and Legal Commentary
Justice Narasimha questioned the NGO’s legal team, stating that lawyers must act as the first barrier against false documents
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, present in court for another matter, concurred with the bench’s concerns about legal ethics
The court refrained from initiating punitive action but emphasized that future misconduct would attract serious consequences
Impact on Smartworks IPO and Investor Sentiment
The dismissal removes a major legal overhang, allowing Smartworks to proceed with its IPO plans
Investor confidence has been buoyed by the court’s validation of the company’s disclosures and regulatory compliance
The IPO, initially subscribed at 0.83 percent on Day 1, surged to 13.45 times overall after additional disclosures were made, including 24.4 times in the Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIB) category
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the appeal against Smartworks Coworking Spaces Ltd. marks a pivotal moment in the company’s journey to public listing. By upholding regulatory transparency and rebuking unethical litigation practices, the court has reinforced the integrity of India’s capital markets. For Smartworks, the ruling clears the runway for its IPO and affirms its standing as a credible player in the fast-growing flexible workspace sector.
Sources: Bar & Bench, UNI India, FlexInsights
Advertisement
Advertisement
