Tunwal E-Motors Limited, a rising player in India’s electric two-wheeler sector, is currently embroiled in a serious regulatory and customs investigation. On August 20, 2025, authorities seized several imported containers belonging to Tunwal E-Motors, leading to a summons being issued to the company. The move comes amid allegations that the company misclassified imported goods to evade customs duties, possibly leading to significant financial implications and scrutiny over adherence to India’s import and subsidy norms.
	
	Background of the Investigation
	
	The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), responsible for customs enforcement and revenue intelligence, launched an inquiry after it was found that Tunwal E-Motors had declared imported electric scooters as “completely knocked down” (CKD) kits under a concessional 15% Basic Customs Duty. Such classification typically benefits companies by allowing lower tariff rates on components intended for local assembly. However, the DRI suspects that the imports were not mere parts but near-complete electric scooters disguised as CKD kits to evade higher duties applicable on fully assembled products.
	
	The probe revealed that more than 90% of the scooter components—including motors, batteries, frames, chargers, and controllers—were imported, with minimal local assembly, conflicting with norms for CKD classification. This practice, if verified, suggests significant customs duty evasion and potential misuse of government subsidies available to promote “Make in India” and “Aatmanirbhar Bharat” initiatives.
	
	Implications for Tunwal E-Motors
	
	The seizure of the containers and the issuance of summons to the company mark a critical juncture that could impact Tunwal’s operations and reputation. The company, which entered the electric vehicle market in 2018 with a focus on affordable quality scooters, had garnered investor interest evidenced by its SME IPO in 2024, where it raised funds to expand manufacturing and distribution.
	
	The customs investigation also aligns with similar ongoing probes into other electric vehicle manufacturers alleged to have evaded import duties by misclassifying imports. The DRI’s concerns extend to subsidy misuse under the Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid & Electric Vehicles (FAME-II) scheme, which requires manufacturers to source a significant portion of components locally to qualify for government support.
	
	Industry Context and Regulatory Scrutiny
	
	The Indian electric vehicle industry is currently under heightened scrutiny as the government emphasizes indigenous manufacturing to reduce dependence on imports, especially from China, which dominates the EV component supply chain. Authorities are keen to enforce localization norms rigorously to encourage domestic production and uphold the integrity of subsidy programs.
	
	Tunwal’s situation occurs amid escalating regulatory vigilance where companies found violating import or subsidy rules risk penalties, loss of subsidies, and reputational damage. Local content requirements under such schemes are designed to foster manufacturing ecosystems, jobs, and technological development within India.
	
	Company’s Response and Market Reaction
	
	As of the latest reports, Tunwal E-Motors has not publicly responded to the summons or the seizure notification. The lack of immediate comment leaves investors and industry observers awaiting clarity on the company’s defense and compliance steps.
	
	Shares of Tunwal E-Motors have seen volatility over the past months, reflecting both growing pains of a new age electric manufacturer and investor apprehension. The seizure and summons add uncertainty, which market participants will watch closely for resolutions affecting the company’s growth trajectory.
	
	Future Outlook and Key Takeaways
	
	Tunwal E-Motors is at a crossroads where transparency, regulatory compliance, and effective communication will be vital. If the company proactively addresses concerns and complies with customs and subsidy norms, it can mitigate damage and continue leveraging India’s burgeoning EV market.
	
	More broadly, this case signals a warning to all players in India’s EV industry about the importance of adhering strictly to import classifications and local content rules. The government’s firm stance reaffirms its commitment to “Make in India” principles and a clean, sustainable electric vehicle ecosystem.
	
	Sources: NSE India, Economic Times, Business Standard, Pune Mirror, Investor Gain