Dee Development Engineers Ltd (DEE) is currently locked in a legal battle over a controversial tariff revision that directly impacts the revenue of its 8 MW biomass power project in Punjab. The company has filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, contesting...
Dee Development Engineers Ltd (DEE) is currently locked in a legal battle over a controversial tariff revision that directly impacts the revenue of its 8 MW biomass power project in Punjab. The company has filed a writ petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, contesting several recent orders issued by the Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission (PSERC) that significantly reduced the tariff rates and authorized retrospective tariff recovery demands by the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL). The case underscores the ongoing tension between renewable energy producers and regulatory authorities over sustainable tariff structures in India’s power sector.
Key Highlights of the Dispute
-
The original tariff, effective till December 2023, was ₹7.47 per kWh. After review orders passed by PSERC between May and September 2025, this tariff was slashed to a net tariff range of ₹5.477 to ₹5.877 per kWh from fiscal years 2023-24 through 2025-26.
-
The reduction primarily affected the variable cost component, which dropped from ₹5.89 per kWh to ₹3.897 per kWh with an annual 5% escalation clause.
-
The downward revision has triggered retrospective recovery demands from PSPCL totaling around ₹13.02 crore for electricity supplied between January 2024 and April 2025.
-
DEE estimates an annual revenue decline of approximately ₹8.20 crore going forward due to the tariff cut.
Background and Current Legal Proceedings
DEE’s biomass power plant located in Abohar, Punjab, operates under a Power Purchase Agreement that initially covered a 13-year tariff period ending December 2023. The latest PSERC orders aimed to fix tariffs for the remaining operational life (until February 2029). Unhappy with the Commission’s methodology and tariff benchmarks—especially the comparison to co-generation units—DEE filed a civil writ petition challenging the orders dated May 15, June 12, August 20, and September 4, 2025. The High Court has admitted the petition and issued notice to respondents, but the matter remains sub judice (pending).
Socio-Economic and Environmental Considerations
DEE highlights the broader socio-economic benefits of its biomass project, which supports over 5,000 rural families engaged in crop residue procurement, transport, and logistics. Annually, the plant injects ₹20–25 crore into the local economy, prevents stubble burning on 45,000+ acres, and avoids over 1.25 lakh tonnes of carbon emissions—contributing significantly to environmental sustainability and rural livelihoods in Punjab.
Strategic Response and Outlook
The company is proactively addressing the financial and regulatory challenges through legal appeals and strategic deliberations. A board meeting is planned to evaluate all possible avenues, including further appeals and protective measures under regulatory laws. DEE stresses that the tariff reduction threatens the long-term viability of its renewable energy assets, necessitating robust defense of its contractual and commercial rights.
This ongoing legal and regulatory confrontation highlights the balancing act between ensuring affordable electricity prices and sustaining renewable energy projects that offer critical environmental and rural development benefits.
Source: Company disclosure to the Stock Exchanges