Top Searches
Advertisement

Beyond the Rs 5.6 Crore Myth: Two Crucial Warnings for Your Retirement Planning


Updated: May 03, 2025 20:17

Image Source: The Economic Times
With the aspiration for early retirement taking hold among working professionals in India, the burning question now is: Is a Rs 5.6 crore corpus really enough to guarantee your post-retirement finances? Bengaluru entrepreneur Anmol Gupta advises prudence, cautioning that earlier formulas no longer apply in the economy of today. He provides two essential cautionary tales that all wannabe retirees must bear in mind before counting on a fixed corpus.
 
The Attraction of Early Retirement:
Early retirement is no longer the preserve of a privileged few. Spurred by burnout, hobbies, and the explosion in popularity of the FIRE (Financial Independence, Retire Early) movement, increasing numbers of Indians are seeking to retire long before the conventional retirement age. Gupta emphasizes, however, that the mathematical calculations behind the fantasy require a new, more realistic strategy.
 
The 4% Rule-A Flawed Compass:
The well-known 4% rule states that if you take away 4% of your investment corpus every year, your savings will last you approximately 30 years. Simply put, if you save 25 times your yearly expenditures, you could in theory retire and be able to live the same way. For instance, if your yearly expenditures are Rs 10 lakh, a corpus of Rs 2.5 crore would be enough under this rule. But Gupta cautions that this method has two significant flaws.
 
Warning 1: The Retirement Window is Longer Than You Think
The 4% rule presumes a 30-year retirement span, ideal for those retiring at the age of 55–60. In case you want to retire in your 40s or even 30s, your retirement may last 40–50 years-much longer than the rule expects. This implies that a corpus computed on the 4% rule may fall considerably short, facing financial insecurity during your old age.
 
Warning 2: Disregarding the erosion of inflation
Quite a lot of people project their retirement requirements assuming today's expense, disregarding the erosion due to inflation caused by the effect of compounding. Gupta captures this in the following example:
  • Today's expenditure: Rs 50,000/month (Rs 6 lakh/year)
  • Current age: 30
  • Expected retirement age: 55
  • Inflation rate: 6%
Using the Rule of 72, expenses will double every 12 years at 6% inflation. By age 55, annual expenses would rise to Rs 24 lakh. Thus, your retirement corpus should be based on Rs 24 lakh/year, not Rs 6 lakh. Applying the 4% rule here, you’d need Rs 6 crore-not Rs 1.5 crore as the unadjusted rule might suggest.
 
Why Rs 5.6 Crore May Not Be Enough:
Considering an extended retirement period and the increasing cost of living, Rs 5.6 crore might not be enough. Healthcare expenses, lifestyle enhancements, and unforeseen expenditure can accelerate the drain on your corpus in the long run.
 
Moving Beyond Thumb Rules-Opt for Intelligent Planning
Gupta encourages people to break free from old shortcuts. With sophisticated AI-driven financial planning software now at hand, retirees can design more customized, dynamic retirement plans that factor in inflation, longevity, and lifestyle shifts. Diversifying your investments and reviewing your plan periodically are key to making your corpus last.
 
Expert Advice:
While the corpus of Rs 5 crore or higher can fund a decent retirement for a few, it is not a universal formula. Considerations of age at retirement, expected life expectancy, health expenditure, and inflation need to be taken carefully into account. A diversified investment plan and a routine check-up of finances are important for a safe retirement. 
 
Takeaway:
Early retirement is well within reach, but only through realistic and prudent financial planning. Don't depend on the 4% rule alone or mere corpus goals. Consider inflation, longevity, and your individual needs in lifestyle. Use contemporary money management tools and professional guidance to construct a retirement strategy that will really withstand the test of time.
 
Source: Economic Times

Advertisement

STORIES YOU MAY LIKE

Advertisement

Advertisement