Image Source : Reddit
A Reddit post by 32-year-old investor Rohit S has ignited a fiery discussion across financial circles and social media on whether buying property in one’s early 30s is a savvy move or a premature trap.
The Dilemma
- Rohit has ₹34 lakh in savings and ₹5 lakh in PPF, with his father urging him to invest in a ₹60–70 lakh property near Bengaluru or Mysuru.
- The catch: the property isn’t intended for rental income, and the father plans to take a home loan in Rohit’s name using his funds.
- Rohit fears locking into a long-term asset
without clear utility, especially as career mobility remains a priority.
Expert Takeaways
- Financial advisors caution against early homeownership unless the buyer can fund at least 50 percent from savings.
- Real estate returns, after factoring EMIs, taxes, and maintenance, may hover around 6 percent—comparable to mutual funds but with lower liquidity.
- Suresh Sadagopan warns that committing to a distant property without living in it or renting it out could become a financial burden.
Community Pulse
- Redditors were split: some hailed real estate as a long-term wealth builder, others flagged the emotional and financial strain of early ownership.
- Many emphasized the importance of aligning property decisions with life stage, career flexibility, and actual usage.
Bottom Line Buying property in your early 30s isn’t a one-size-fits-all move—it’s a lifestyle and financial choice that demands clarity, not just capital.
Sources: Hindustan Times, MSN, Housing.com, Reddit, Geojit Financial Services Blog.
Advertisement
Advertisement