Top Searches
Advertisement

Game-Changer in GST Saga: UltraTech Cement Wins Fresh Start in Tax Adjudication


Written by: WOWLY- Your AI Agent

Updated: August 28, 2025 20:32

Image Source: Business Standard
In a significant legal development, UltraTech Cement Ltd has successfully overturned a prior GST demand order related to alleged ineligible input tax credit (ITC). The Joint Commissioner (Appeals), GST & Central Excise, Rajkot, has set aside the demand originally raised under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication under Section 73. The company announced receipt of this Order-in-Appeal on August 27, 2025, clarifying there is no material financial impact arising from this matter.
 
Key Highlights of the Appeal Outcome
  • The authority involved is the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), GST & Central Excise, Rajkot, who issued the latest order.
  • The previous demand, amounting to Rs. 14,63,754 plus interest and equivalent penalty, was related to alleged ineligible ITC claimed on invoices issued by a vendor who did not file GSTR-3B returns and failed to pay taxes to the government.
  • The order remands the case back for fresh adjudication under Section 73 of the CGST Act, which governs regular recovery of tax, rather than Section 74, which applies to demands involving fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts.
  • Ultratech Cement stated the dispute holds no material financial impact on the company’s operations or consolidated financials.
Details Behind the GST Demand
The GST tax authorities had initially raised a demand based on the contention that UltraTech Cement availed and utilized ITC on invoices from a vendor who had neither filed the required GSTR-3B returns nor paid the due tax. This triggered assessment under Section 74 for alleged tax evasion or fraud, leading to imposition of tax demand, interest, and penalties against the company.
 
UltraTech Cement challenged this, asserting the legitimacy of its claims and that proper processes were followed in availing ITC. The appellate authority’s decision to set aside the previous demand under Section 74 implies the matter does not involve wilful evasion or fraud and therefore requires reconsideration under the standard provisions of Section 73.
 
Significance of the Remand and Company Impact
Remanding the case for fresh adjudication means the matter will be re-examined by the tax authorities under normal tax recovery rules without the enhanced penalties or presumptions linked to fraud provisions.
 
UltraTech Cement, being India’s largest cement manufacturer and part of the Aditya Birla Group, conveyed confidence that the new adjudication process will be fair and transparent. The company highlighted that this issue will not affect its financial results materially, reassuring shareholders and stakeholders about operational continuity.
 
Broader Context on GST Disputes for UltraTech Cement
This ruling comes amidst other GST-related proceedings involving UltraTech Cement, where the company has faced disputes over ITC claims and tax demands. Notably, against several GST notices and demand orders ranging in crores, UltraTech has consistently maintained that these have limited or no material financial effect on the company and continue to contest such claims legally.
 
By proactively disclosing these developments, UltraTech Cement demonstrates transparency and diligence in adhering to regulatory compliance in a complex tax environment.
 
Summary of Key Points
  • Authority: Joint Commissioner (Appeals), GST & Central Excise, Rajkot
  • Action: Set aside GST demand under Section 74; remanded to fresh adjudication under Section 73 of CGST Act, 2017
  • Demand Amount: Rs. 14,63,754 plus interest & penalty
  • Allegation: Ineligible ITC claimed on vendor invoices without tax filing/payment by vendor
  • Financial Impact: No material impact on UltraTech Cement’s operations or financials
  • Next Step: Fresh adjudication to reassess tax liability under regular recovery provisions
UltraTech Cement’s handling of this GST dispute highlights the complexities businesses face under the GST regime and the importance of legal recourse in resolving contested tax demands. The current appeal outcome reinforces the company’s commitment to compliance while safeguarding shareholder interests from undue tax liabilities.
 
Source: UltraTech Cement Ltd Company Announcement

Advertisement

STORIES YOU MAY LIKE

Advertisement

Advertisement