Image Source : The Munsif Daily.
The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court dismissed Masjid Gousiya's petition in Gondia, Maharashtra, seeking loudspeaker restoration for prayers, ruling no religion mandates amplified calls or drums. Citing noise pollution risks, the court initiated a suo motu PIL urging Maharashtra to frame stricter regulations.
Show more
Court Ruling
Justices Anil Pansare and Raj Wakode, in a December 1 order, relied on Supreme Court precedents to affirm that religious practice cannot infringe on others' right to quietude through noise. The mosque failed to provide evidence proving loudspeakers as essential to Islam, dismissing claims of entitlement. Noise above 120 decibels endangers hearing, especially for children, elderly, and those with mental health issues.
The bench highlighted violations at event halls and religious sites, taking suo motu cognisance for a comprehensive state framework on recurring noise pollution.
Key Highlights
Core Rejection: Loudspeakers not "mandatory/necessary" for faith; no religious text supports amplification over peaceful prayer.
Public Health Focus: Protects vulnerable groups from distress; prayers must not disturb others' peace.
Suo Motu Action: PIL launched; Maharashtra government directed for effective noise control measures.
Broader Precedent: Aligns with SC rulings barring drums/amps that violate Noise Pollution Rules.
Sources: Indian Express, Telegraph India, The Week, LiveLaw.
Stay Ahead – Explore Now!
India's Economic Rebound: RBI Predicts Strong Growth in H2 FY25
Advertisement
Advertisement