Not Too Robotic, Not Too Human: The Goldilocks Rule for Chatbots

Updated: November 30, 2025 14:01

Image Source: Deccan Herald

A balanced level of humanised AI in chatbot design enhances customer trust and comfort, with moderate empathy and contextual awareness proving most effective. Over-humanisation can backfire, while a hybrid approach combining AI and human support delivers optimal results.

A new research study from a leading business school reveals that a carefully balanced approach to humanising AI in chatbots significantly boosts customer trust and comfort. The findings indicate that while advanced chatbot technology can automate and streamline customer service, the key to building lasting relationships lies in the subtle integration of human-like traits—without crossing into uncanny territory.

Key Highlights

Optimal Humanisation Matters: The research demonstrates that chatbots designed with a moderate level of human-like features—such as empathy, conversational style, and context awareness—make customers feel more at ease and foster trust. Excessive human resemblance, however, can create discomfort and skepticism among users.
Empathy Drives Satisfaction: When chatbots are able to respond with empathy, acknowledge customer emotions, and adapt their tone, satisfaction levels rise. This empathetic approach helps customers feel understood and valued, even in digital interactions.
Balancing Automation and Human Touch: The study recommends a hybrid model where chatbots handle routine queries efficiently, while complex or emotionally sensitive issues are escalated to human agents. This seamless transition ensures customers receive both speed and emotional support.
Design Impacts Perception: The appearance, interaction style, and reliability of AI agents strongly influence how customers perceive and trust them. A unified framework developed by the researchers explains how these design elements, combined with user traits and service context, shape customer outcomes.
Ethical Boundaries and Research Gaps: The study also highlights the need for clearer ethical guidelines on how much human likeness is appropriate, and calls for further research into cross-cultural differences, social identity, and the psychological effects of AI humanisation.

Source: Economic Times, Business Standard

Stay Ahead – Explore Now! India’s UPI 3.0: The Future of Payments Speaks – Now Voice-Activated and Globally Accessible!