Image Source: Free Press Journal
A fiery exchange between BharatPe’s Ashneer Grover and Zerodha’s Nithin Kamath has sparked debate over India’s startup tax logic. Kamath criticized the capital gains-driven ecosystem, while Grover challenged its sustainability, asking whether Zerodha itself would survive under Kamath’s proposed dividend-focused model.
Show more
India’s startup ecosystem witnessed a sharp ideological clash this week as Ashneer Grover publicly challenged Zerodha co-founder Nithin Kamath’s views on taxation and business sustainability. Kamath had earlier criticized the prevailing tax incentives that favor capital gains over dividends, arguing that they promote cash-burning ventures and IPO-driven exits rather than long-term profitability.
Grover responded by questioning the practicality of Kamath’s logic, pointing out that drawing profits as dividends incurs a much higher effective tax rate—up to 52%—compared to just 14.95% on capital gains. He provocatively asked whether Zerodha would still be in business if it followed the dividend-first model Kamath seemed to advocate.
Key Highlights:
- Kamath’s Critique:
Warned that India’s startup incentives encourage unsustainable growth and IPO dependency.
- Grover’s Counterpoint:
Argued that the tax disparity between dividends and capital gains makes Kamath’s model unrealistic.
- Tax Breakdown:
Dividends face ~52% tax (corporate + personal), while capital gains are taxed at ~14.95%.
- Industry Implications:
The debate has reignited discussions on whether India’s VC-backed startups are building enduring businesses or chasing exits.
Sources: Business Today, Free Press Journal.
Stay Ahead – Explore Now!
SEBI’s Intraday Derivative Crackdown: What Every Trader Must Know Before October
Advertisement
Advertisement